↓ Skip to main content

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Oligomenorrhea, and Risk of Ovarian Cancer Histotypes: Evidence from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Oligomenorrhea, and Risk of Ovarian Cancer Histotypes: Evidence from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, February 2018
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-17-0655
Pubmed ID
Authors

Holly R. Harris, Ana Babic, Penelope M. Webb, Christina M. Nagle, Susan J. Jordan, on behalf of the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Harvey A. Risch, Mary Anne Rossing, Jennifer A. Doherty, Marc T. Goodman, Francesmary Modugno, Roberta B. Ness, Kirsten B. Moysich, Susanne K. Kjær, Estrid Høgdall, Allan Jensen, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Andrew Berchuck, Daniel W. Cramer, Elisa V. Bandera, Nicolas Wentzensen, Joanne Kotsopoulos, Steven A. Narod, Catherine M. Phelan, John R. McLaughlin, Hoda Anton-Culver, Argyrios Ziogas, Celeste L. Pearce, Anna H. Wu, Kathryn L. Terry, on behalf of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and one if its distinguishing characteristics, oligomenorrhea, have both been associated with ovarian cancer risk in some but not all studies. However, these associations have been rarely been examined by ovarian cancer histotypes which may explain the lack of clear associations reported in previous studies. We analyzed data from 14 case-control studies including 16,594 women with invasive ovarian cancer (n=13,719) or borderline ovarian disease (n=2,875) and 17,718 controls. Adjusted study-specific odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using logistic regression and combined using random-effects meta-analysis. Pooled histotype-specific ORs were calculated using polytomous logistic regression. Women reporting menstrual cycle length >35 days had decreased risk of invasive ovarian cancer compared to women reporting cycle length <=35 days (OR=0.70; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]=0.58-0.84). Decreased risk of invasive ovarian cancer was also observed among women who reported irregular menstrual cycles compared to women with regular cycles (OR=0.83; 95% CI=0.76-0.89). No significant association was observed between self-reported PCOS and invasive ovarian cancer risk (OR=0.87; 95% CI=0.65-1.15). There was a decreased risk of all individual invasive histotypes for women with menstrual cycle length >35 days, but no association with serous borderline tumors (pheterogeneity=0.006). Similarly, we observed decreased risks of most invasive histotypes among women with irregular cycles but an increased risk of borderline serous and mucinous tumors (pheterogeneity<0.0001). Our results suggest that menstrual cycle characteristics influence ovarian cancer risk differentially based on histotype. These results highlight the importance of examining ovarian cancer risk factors associations by histologic subtype.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Master 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 47 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 52 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2019.
All research outputs
#16,815,384
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#3,284
of 4,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,387
of 447,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#25
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.