You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ebch.1971 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan J McDonald, Philippa Middleton, Therese Dowswell, Peter S Morris |
| Abstract |
Policies for timing of cord clamping vary, with early cord clamping generally carried out in the first 60 seconds after birth, whereas later cord clamping usually involves clamping the umbilical cord more than one minute after the birth or when cord pulsation has ceased. The benefits and potential harms of each policy are debated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 669 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 652 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 97 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 79 | 12% |
| Researcher | 72 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 42 | 6% |
| Other | 133 | 20% |
| Unknown | 197 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 249 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 108 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 4% |
| Psychology | 17 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 46 | 7% |
| Unknown | 211 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#847,735
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal
#1
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,603
of 229,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them