You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
「アボリジナルの近代スポーツ史-19~20世紀のオーストラリア」をめぐって(スポーツ史学会第22回大会シンポジウム再録)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Japan Journal of Sport History, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.19010/jjshjb.23.0_55 |
| Authors |
藤川 隆男, 高木 勇夫, 小澤 英二, 井上 邦子, 坂上 康博 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The Japan Journal of Sport History
#14
of 25 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,364
of 102,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japan Journal of Sport History
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.