↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: The role of nuclear medicine in assessments of cardiac dyssynchrony

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: The role of nuclear medicine in assessments of cardiac dyssynchrony
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12350-017-1113-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masanao Naya, Osamu Manabe, Kazuhiro Koyanagawa, Nagara Tamaki

Abstract

Some of the values in Table 3 of the original publication inadvertently contained discrepancies with the literature from which they were taken. A corrected version of Table 3 can be found below; the values which have been corrected now appear in bold text (row: Romero-Farina G).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#1,303
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,270
of 445,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#31
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.