| Title |
Holobionts as Units of Selection and a Model of Their Population Dynamics and Evolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Theory, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13752-017-0287-1 |
| Authors |
Joan Roughgarden, Scott F. Gilbert, Eugene Rosenberg, Ilana Zilber-Rosenberg, Elisabeth A. Lloyd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 30% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 5% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
| Scientists | 7 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 18% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 55 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 6% |
| Philosophy | 7 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 61 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,121,917
of 24,618,075 outputs
Outputs from Biological Theory
#12
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,255
of 441,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Theory
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,618,075 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them