↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and predictors of germline CDKN2A mutations for melanoma cases from Australia, Spain and the United Kingdom

Overview of attention for article published in Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 260)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence and predictors of germline CDKN2A mutations for melanoma cases from Australia, Spain and the United Kingdom
Published in
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1897-4287-12-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Harland, Anne E Cust, Celia Badenas, Yu-Mei Chang, Elizabeth A Holland, Paula Aguilera, Joanne F Aitken, Bruce K Armstrong, Jennifer H Barrett, Cristina Carrera, May Chan, Joanne Gascoyne, Graham G Giles, Chantelle Agha-Hamilton, John L Hopper, Mark A Jenkins, Peter A Kanetsky, Richard F Kefford, Isabel Kolm, Johanna Lowery, Josep Malvehy, Zighereda Ogbah, Joan-Anton Puig-Butille, Jordi Orihuela-Segalés, Juliette A Randerson-Moor, Helen Schmid, Claire F Taylor, Linda Whitaker, D Timothy Bishop, Graham J Mann, Julia A Newton-Bishop, Susana Puig

Abstract

Mutations in the CDKN2A and CDK4 genes predispose to melanoma. From three case-control studies of cutaneous melanoma, we estimated the prevalence and predictors of these mutations for people from regions with widely differing latitudes and melanoma incidence. Population-based cases and controls from the United Kingdom (1586 cases, 499 controls) and Australia (596 early-onset cases, 476 controls), and a hospital-based series from Spain (747 cases, 109 controls), were screened for variants in all exons of CDKN2A and the p16INK4A binding domain of CDK4. The prevalence of mutations for people with melanoma was similar across regions: 2.3%, 2.5% and 2.0% for Australia, Spain and the United Kingdom respectively. The strongest predictors of carrying a mutation were having multiple primaries (odds ratio (OR) = 5.4, 95% confidence interval (CI: 2.5, 11.6) for 2 primaries and OR = 32.4 (95% CI: 14.7, 71.2) for 3 or more compared with 1 primary only); and family history (OR = 3.8; 95% CI:1.89, 7.5) for 1 affected first- or second-degree relative and OR = 23.2 (95% CI: 11.3, 47.6) for 2 or more compared with no affected relatives). Only 1.1% of melanoma cases with neither a family history nor multiple primaries had mutations. There is a low probability (<2%) of detecting a germline CDKN2A mutation in people with melanoma except for those with a strong family history of melanoma (≥2 affected relatives, 25%), three or more primary melanomas (29%), or more than one primary melanoma who also have other affected relatives (27%).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 14 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Chemistry 1 2%
Unknown 15 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,754,661
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
#49
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,001
of 369,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.