↓ Skip to main content

SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL PATTERNS OF AVIAN PARAMYXOVIRUS-1 OUTBREAKS IN DOUBLE-CRESTED CORMORANTS (PHALACROCORAX AURITUS) IN THE USA

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Diseases, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL PATTERNS OF AVIAN PARAMYXOVIRUS-1 OUTBREAKS IN DOUBLE-CRESTED CORMORANTS (PHALACROCORAX AURITUS) IN THE USA
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Diseases, January 2015
DOI 10.7589/2014-05-132
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. LeAnn White, Hon S. Ip, Carol U. Meteyer, Daniel P. Walsh, Jeffrey S. Hall, Michelle Carstensen, Paul C. Wolf

Abstract

Abstract Morbidity and mortality events caused by avian paramyxovirus-1 (APMV-1) in Double-crested Cormorant (DCCO; Phalacrocorax auritus) nesting colonies in the US and Canada have been sporadically documented in the literature. We describe APMV-1 associated outbreaks in DCCO in the US from the first reported occurrence in 1992 through 2012. The frequency of APMV-1 outbreaks has increased in the US over the last decade, but the majority of events have continued to occur in DCCO colonies in the Midwestern states. Although morbidity and mortality in conesting species has been frequently reported during DCCO APMV-1 outbreaks, our results suggest that isolation of APMV-1 is uncommon in species other than DCCO during APMV-1 outbreaks and that the cause of mortality in other species is associated with other pathogens. Populations of DCCO do not appear to have been significantly affected by this disease; however, because at least 65% of the APMV-1 outbreaks in DCCO in the US have involved APMV-1 strains classified as virulent to poultry (virulent Newcastle disease virus), its persistence and increased occurrence in DCCO warrants continued research and surveillance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 9%
Unknown 41 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Other 10 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 18%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#1,054
of 1,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,742
of 359,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#21
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.