↓ Skip to main content

SEURAT-1 liver gold reference compounds: a mechanism-based review

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
SEURAT-1 liver gold reference compounds: a mechanism-based review
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00204-014-1410-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Jennings, Michael Schwarz, Brigitte Landesmann, Silvia Maggioni, Marina Goumenou, David Bower, Martin O. Leonard, Jeffrey S. Wiseman

Abstract

There is an urgent need for the development of alternative methods to replace animal testing for the prediction of repeat dose chemical toxicity. To address this need, the European Commission and Cosmetics Europe have jointly funded a research program for 'Safety Evaluation Ultimately Replacing Animal Testing.' The goal of this program was the development of in vitro cellular systems and associated computational capabilities for the prediction of hepatic, cardiac, renal, neuronal, muscle, and skin toxicities. An essential component of this effort is the choice of appropriate reference compounds that can be used in the development and validation of assays. In this review, we focus on the selection of reference compounds for liver pathologies in the broad categories of cytotoxicity and lipid disorders. Mitochondrial impairment, oxidative stress, and apoptosis are considered under the category of cytotoxicity, while steatosis, cholestasis, and phospholipidosis are considered under the category of lipid dysregulation. We focused on four compound classes capable of initiating such events, i.e., chemically reactive compounds, compounds with specific cellular targets, compounds that modulate lipid regulatory networks, and compounds that disrupt the plasma membrane. We describe the molecular mechanisms of these compounds and the cellular response networks which they elicit. This information will be helpful to both improve our understanding of mode of action and help in the selection of appropriate mechanistic biomarkers, allowing us to progress the development of animal-free models with improved predictivity to the human situation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Bulgaria 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Computer Science 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,184,819
of 23,920,246 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#910
of 2,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,959
of 261,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,920,246 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.