| Title |
Return to play following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review about strength deficits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00402-014-1992-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wolf Petersen, Pouria Taheri, Phillip Forkel, Thore Zantop |
| Abstract |
There is a lack of consensus regarding appropriate criteria attesting patients' unrestricted sports activities after ACL reconstruction. Purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review about strength deficits to find out if a strength test might be a return to play criterion. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Sweden | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 393 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 73 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 72 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 65 | 16% |
| Unknown | 101 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 23% |
| Sports and Recreations | 87 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 62 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Engineering | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Unknown | 117 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,742,753
of 24,963,265 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#58
of 1,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,032
of 235,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,963,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.