Title |
Parenting and family adjustment scales (PAFAS): validation of a brief parent-report measure for use with families who have a child with a developmental disability
|
---|---|
Published in |
Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.10.011 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Trevor G. Mazzucchelli, Julie Hodges, Robert T. Kane, Kate Sofronoff, Matthew R. Sanders, Stewart Einfeld, Bruce Tonge, Kylie M. Gray, MHYPEDD Project Team |
Abstract |
Children with a developmental disability are three to four times more likely than their typically developing peers of developing significant emotional and behavioural problems. There is strong evidence to suggest that individual biological and psychological factors interact with family functioning to precipitate and perpetuate these problems. This study examined the psychometric properties of a brief measure, the Parent and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS) for use with parents of children with a developmental disability. A sample of 914 parents of children (M=6.27years) with a developmental disability participated in the study. Disabilities included Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability RESULTS: A confirmatory factor analysis supported a 16-item, four factor model of PAFAS Parenting, and an 11-item, three factor model of PAFAS Family Adjustment. The Parenting Scale measures parental consistency, coercive practices, use of encouragement and the quality of parent-child relationship. The Family Adjustment Scale measures parental emotional adjustment and partner and family support in parenting. The current study indicated that the PAFAS demonstrates promise as a brief measure of multiple domains of family functioning important for families who have a child with a developmental disability. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 12% |
Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 12% |
Unknown | 51 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 55 | 37% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 6 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 3% |
Unknown | 53 | 36% |