↓ Skip to main content

Nature of association between rural background and practice location: A comparison of general practitioners and specialists

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Nature of association between rural background and practice location: A comparison of general practitioners and specialists
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-11-63
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew R McGrail, John S Humphreys, Catherine M Joyce

Abstract

Rural and remote areas are characterised by a shortage of medical practitioners. Rural background has been shown to be a significant factor associated with medical graduates' intentions and decisions to practise within a rural area, though most studies have only used simple definitions of rural background and not previously looked at specialists. This paper aims to investigate in detail the nature of the association between rural background and practice location of Australian general practitioners (GPs) and specialists

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 32%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 24 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2014.
All research outputs
#1,760,940
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#628
of 7,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,498
of 108,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.