| Title |
Moving agriculture onto the Tibetan plateau: the archaeobotanical evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-013-0153-4 |
| Authors |
Jade d’Alpoim Guedes, Hongliang Lu, Yongxian Li, Robert N. Spengler, Xiaohong Wu, Mark S. Aldenderfer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 20% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 14 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,871,301
of 23,544,006 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#128
of 827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,623
of 199,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,544,006 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them