↓ Skip to main content

Biomechanical stress in myocardial infarctions: can endothelin-1 and growth differentiation factor 15 serve as immunohistochemical markers?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Biomechanical stress in myocardial infarctions: can endothelin-1 and growth differentiation factor 15 serve as immunohistochemical markers?
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00414-017-1726-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Falk, R. Huhn, F. Behmenburg, St Ritz-Timme, F. Mayer

Abstract

Myocardial infarctions go along with biomechanical stress, i.e. stretching of muscle fibres, and the expression of certain marker molecules. We tested if two of those markers, endothelin-1 (ET-1) and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), can be used as immunohistochemical markers for myocardial ischaemia/infarctions. The study included experiments with an animal model, the isolated perfused Langendorff heart, as well as the investigation of human tissue samples drawn during autopsies. The overall picture of our results showed that GDF-15 is very sensitive and expressed very fast, not only as a consequence of ischaemia/infarctions, but also under other circumstances. Even an expression only caused by agony had to be discussed. ET-1, on the other hand, was less sensitive but only positive in those human cases with ischaemia/infarction that also showed typical alterations in conventional histology. Therefore, both markers did not proof to be a suitable diagnostic tool for myocardial infarctions. However, positive staining for ET-1 was also seen in rats' hearts that suffered from arrhythmias after electric shock and in the myocardium of the right ventricle in human control cases in which a right heart failure has to be discussed. Thus, especially ET-1 should be subject of further studies that focus on these pathologies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 21 78%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 22%
Materials Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 19 70%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,483,707
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#972
of 2,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,149
of 437,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#32
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,084 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.