↓ Skip to main content

10-Year Outcomes of the Vertical Transected Gastric Bypass for Obesity: a Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
10-Year Outcomes of the Vertical Transected Gastric Bypass for Obesity: a Systematic Review
Published in
Obesity Surgery, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11695-013-1161-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taulee Hsieh, Luis Zurita, Harpreet Grover, Athena Bennett, Forough Farrokhyar, Scott Gmora, Mehran Anvari, Dennis Hong

Abstract

With increasing worldwide obesity rates, the surgery of choice has become the vertical transected gastric bypass, showing short-term improvements in weight loss and comorbidities. However, corresponding 10-year data regarding such endpoints is limited. The objective of this review was to assess such evidence. A literature search yielded a total of five studies, of which three had extractable data. Results revealed a reduction in the weighted mean body mass index (BMI), from a pre- to post-operative mean BMI of 47.5 kg/m(2) ± 2.0 to 33.4 kg/m(2) ± 4.4 at 10 years. The weighted mean excess weight loss was 61.4 % ± 13.5. Although these results suggest that weight reduction may be sustainable in the long term, this systematic review demonstrates a lack of strong evidence to support favorable long-term outcomes following vertical transected gastric bypass for obesity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 26%
Other 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Librarian 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Psychology 3 10%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 13%