↓ Skip to main content

当院市中肺炎患者における入院時栄養状態がADL能力に及ぼす影響

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Care and Rehabilitation, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 101)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
当院市中肺炎患者における入院時栄養状態がADL能力に及ぼす影響
Published in
The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Care and Rehabilitation, September 2017
DOI 10.15032/jsrcr.27.1_65
Authors

村川 勇一, 南木 伸基, 宮崎 慎二郎, 寒川 美由紀, 堀 竜馬, 中井 友里恵, 名出 美紀

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,526,423
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Care and Rehabilitation
#29
of 101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,773
of 324,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Care and Rehabilitation
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them