You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prostate-Specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy as a Predictive Factor of Clinical Relapse-Free Survival and Overall Survival: 10-Year Data of the ARO 96-02 Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.039 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Wiegel, Detlef Bartkowiak, Dirk Bottke, Reinhard Thamm, Axel Hinke, Michael Stöckle, Christian Rübe, Axel Semjonow, Manfred Wirth, Stephan Störkel, Reinhard Golz, Rita Engenhart-Cabillic, Rainer Hofmann, Horst-Jürgen Feldmann, Tilman Kälble, Alessandra Siegmann, Wolfgang Hinkelbein, Ursula Steiner, Kurt Miller |
| Abstract |
The ARO 96-02 trial primarily compared wait-and-see (WS, arm A) with adjuvant radiation therapy (ART, arm B) in prostate cancer patients who achieved an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Here, we report the outcome with up to 12 years of follow-up of patients who retained a post-RP detectable PSA and received salvage radiation therapy (SRT, arm C). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 44% |
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 24 | 29% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 59% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,034,120
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#321
of 11,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,085
of 369,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#1
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.