↓ Skip to main content

HPV-16 L1 VLP vaccine elicits a broad-spectrum of cytokine responses in whole blood

Overview of attention for article published in Vaccine, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HPV-16 L1 VLP vaccine elicits a broad-spectrum of cytokine responses in whole blood
Published in
Vaccine, May 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ligia A. Pinto, Philip E. Castle, Richard B. Roden, Clayton D. Harro, Douglas R. Lowy, John T. Schiller, Dora Wallace, Marcus Williams, William Kopp, Ian H. Frazer, Jay A. Berzofsky, Allan Hildesheim

Abstract

Here, we evaluated innate and adaptive immune system cytokine responses induced by HPV-16 L1 VLP in whole blood (WB) cultures from individuals receiving the vaccine (n=20) or placebo (n=4) before and after vaccination. 11 cytokines were measured: IL-1beta, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, and GM-CSF using multiplex bead arrays. Cytokine profiles from WB samples clearly discriminated between vaccine and placebo recipients and between pre and post-vaccination responses. Significant increases in Th1, Th2 and inflammatory cytokines were observed in WB assays following vaccination. Results from WB assays were compared against parallel PBMC-based assays in a subset of patients. Differences between whole blood assay and PBMC were observed, with the highest levels of induction found for WB for several cytokines. Our results indicate that multiplex assays for cytokine profiling in WB are an efficient tool for assessing broad spectrum, innate and adaptive immune responses to vaccines and identifying immunologic correlates of protection in efficacy studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#4,479
of 16,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,317
of 70,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#33
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.