You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nondestructive estimates of above‐ground biomass using terrestrial laser scanning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.12301 |
| Authors |
Kim Calders, Glenn Newnham, Andrew Burt, Simon Murphy, Pasi Raumonen, Martin Herold, Darius Culvenor, Valerio Avitabile, Mathias Disney, John Armston, Mikko Kaasalainen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 18% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| Belgium | 2 | 9% |
| Norway | 2 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 641 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 621 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 111 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 111 | 17% |
| Researcher | 96 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 5% |
| Other | 103 | 16% |
| Unknown | 135 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 180 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 128 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 84 | 13% |
| Engineering | 29 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 5% |
| Unknown | 174 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,261,099
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#515
of 2,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,078
of 374,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.