You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Barriers to uptake and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among communities most affected by HIV in the UK: findings from a qualitative study in Scotland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005717 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingrid Young, Paul Flowers, Lisa M McDaid |
| Abstract |
To explore the acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among gay, bisexual and men who have sex with men (MSM) and migrant African communities in Scotland, UK. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 71% |
| Thailand | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 36% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 320 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 72 | 22% |
| Researcher | 50 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 48 | 15% |
| Unknown | 63 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 47 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 14% |
| Psychology | 19 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 10% |
| Unknown | 74 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#911,086
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#1,588
of 25,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,358
of 369,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#21
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.