| Title |
c-Abl in Neurodegenerative Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12031-011-9588-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah D. Schlatterer, Christopher M. Acker, Peter Davies |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 22% |
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,246,273
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#28
of 1,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,180
of 130,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,665 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.