You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
E7-2 介護入浴向け泡シャワー装置の開発と評価Ⅱ
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.5100/jje.53.s266 |
Authors |
大西 範和, 斎藤 真, 大平 肇子, 小松 美砂, 長谷川 智之, 西濵 里英, 松島 至俊, HUANG Ya-wen, 近藤 晃一, 坂本 直久, 松岡 敏生 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics
#183
of 212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#320,195
of 421,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.