↓ Skip to main content

Associations Between Nucleus Size, and Immunohistochemical Galectin-3, Cytokeratine-19 and Hbme-1 Markers in Thyroid Papillary Carcinoma: A Morphometric Analyze

Overview of attention for article published in Pathology & Oncology Research, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Associations Between Nucleus Size, and Immunohistochemical Galectin-3, Cytokeratine-19 and Hbme-1 Markers in Thyroid Papillary Carcinoma: A Morphometric Analyze
Published in
Pathology & Oncology Research, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12253-017-0337-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hatice Toy, Ozlem Etli, Zeliha Esin Celik, Arsenal Sezgin Alikanoglu

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the morphometric measurements in cases with papillary thyroid carcinoma, and determine a cut-off value to support diagnosis. Fifty cases with a diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) were included in the study with their Galectine-3, CK-19 and HBME-1 immunohistochemical staining results. Demographic and clinical data gathered from pathology reports, which included demographic information such as patients' sex, age, macroscopic tumor size, number of tumor focuses; prognostic parameters such as lenfovascular invasion, perineural invasion, thyroid capsule invasion; and results of immunohistochemical CK- 19, Galectin-3 and HBME-1 staining. Longest nuclear diameters of 150 tumor cells and 150 normal thyrocytes of each case were manually measured in an image analysis software, and mean longest nuclear diameters (MLND-TC and MLND-NC), and also tumor cell/normal cell longest nuclear diameter ratio (TC/NC-LNDR) were calculated. MLND-TC was higher than MLND-NC. The cases with higher MLND-TC had increased risk of capsule invasion in case of a negative staining with Galectine-3, HBME-1, or CK-19. When TC/NC-LNDR was high, number of tumor focus tended to be multiple and lymphovascular invasion risk was also increased. Subtypes of PTC were not differed regarding staining patterns. And finally, increased TC/NC-LNDR was associated with increased risk of having poor prognostic factors. The results of this study suggest that MLND-NC, MLND-TC, and TC/NCLNDR are valuable and easy-to-use measures, which can assist routine histology practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 78%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,452,930
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Pathology & Oncology Research
#465
of 720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#366,946
of 431,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathology & Oncology Research
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.