↓ Skip to main content

Aerobic power and flight capacity in birds: a phylogenetic test of the heart-size hypothesis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Biology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aerobic power and flight capacity in birds: a phylogenetic test of the heart-size hypothesis
Published in
Journal of Experimental Biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1242/jeb.162693
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto F. Nespolo, César González-Lagos, Jaiber J. Solano-Iguaran, Magnus Elfwing, Alvaro Garitano-Zavala, Santiago Mañosa, Juan Carlos Alonso, Jordi Altimiras

Abstract

Flight capacity is one of the most important innovations in animal evolution; it only evolved in insects, birds, mammals and the extinct pterodactyls. Given that powered flight represents a demanding aerobic activity, an efficient cardiovascular system is essential for the continuous delivery of oxygen to the pectoral muscles during flight. It is well known that the limiting step in the circulation is stroke volume (the volume of blood pumped from the ventricle to the body during each beat), which is determined by the size of the ventricle. Thus, the fresh mass of the heart represents a simple and repeatable anatomic measure of aerobic power of an animal. Although several authors have already compared heart masses across bird species, a phylogenetic comparative analysis of these comparisons is still lacking. Compiling heart sizes for 915 species and applying several statistical procedures controlling for body size and/or testing for adaptive trends in the dataset (e.g., model selection approaches, phylogenetic generalized linear models), we found that (residuals of) heart sizes are consistently associated with four categories of flight capacity. In general, our results indicate that species exhibiting continuous hovering flight (i.e., hummingbirds) have substantially larger hearts than do other groups, that species that use flapping flight and gliding show intermediate values, and that species categorized as poor flyers show the smallest values. Our study shows that at a broad scale, routine flight modes seem to have shaped the energetic requirements of birds sufficiently to be anatomically detected at the comparative level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 44%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 6%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 14 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,755,994
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Biology
#3,441
of 9,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,078
of 421,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Biology
#137
of 347 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 347 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.