↓ Skip to main content

The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand HBED-CC in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
60 patents
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
446 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand HBED-CC in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00259-014-2949-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Since the introduction of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with (68)Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC (=(68)Ga-DKFZ-PSMA-11), this method has been regarded as a significant step forward in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). However, published data exist for small patient cohorts only. The aim of this evaluation was to analyse the diagnostic value of (68)Ga-PSMA-ligand PET/CT in a large cohort and the influence of several possibly interacting variables.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 446 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 437 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 67 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 11%
Other 38 9%
Student > Bachelor 35 8%
Student > Postgraduate 35 8%
Other 99 22%
Unknown 124 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 191 43%
Chemistry 29 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 4%
Physics and Astronomy 14 3%
Engineering 9 2%
Other 43 10%
Unknown 143 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2026.
All research outputs
#2,104,736
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#146
of 5,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,235
of 423,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.