↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy and prognostic value of variant histology and lymphovascular invasion at transurethral resection of bladder

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Urology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Accuracy and prognostic value of variant histology and lymphovascular invasion at transurethral resection of bladder
Published in
World Journal of Urology, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00345-017-2116-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad Abufaraj, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Beat Foerster, Carmen Pozo, Marco Moschini, David D’Andrea, Romain Mathieu, Martin Susani, Anna K. Czech, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Veronika Seebacher

Abstract

To evaluate the concordance rate of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and variant histology (VH) of transurethral resection (TUR) with radical cystectomy (RC) specimens. Furthermore, to evaluate the value of LVI and VH at TUR for predicting non-organ confined (NOC) disease, lymph node metastasis, and survival outcomes. Two hundred and sixty-eight patients who underwent TUR and subsequent RC were reviewed. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of LVI and VH with NOC and lymph node metastasis at RC. Cox regression analyses were used to estimate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). LVI and VH were detected in 13.8 and 11.2% of TUR specimens, and in 30.2 and 25.4% of RC specimens, respectively. The concordance rate between LVI and VH at TUR and subsequent RC was 69.8 and 83.6%, respectively. They were both associated with adverse pathological features such as lymph node metastasis and advanced stage. TUR LVI and VH were both independently associated with lymph node metastasis and TUR VH was independently associated with NOC. On univariable Cox regression analyses, TUR LVI was associated with RFS and CSS while TUR VH was only associated with RFS. Only TUR LVI was independently associated with RFS. Detection of LVI is missed in a third of TUR specimens while VH seems more accurately identified. TUR LVI and VH are associated with more advanced disease and LVI predicts disease recurrence. Assessment and reporting of LVI and VH on TUR specimen are important for risk stratification and decision-making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 29%
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Other 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 39%
Engineering 4 11%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,339,176
of 25,387,480 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#621
of 2,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,072
of 334,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#10
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.