You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychologia, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jared Cooney Horvath, Jason D. Forte, Olivia Carter |
| Abstract |
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of neuromodulation that is increasingly being utilized to examine and modify a number of cognitive and behavioral measures. The theoretical mechanisms by which tDCS generates these changes are predicated upon a rather large neurophysiological literature. However, a robust systematic review of this neurophysiological data has not yet been undertaken. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 18% |
| United States | 11 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 5% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| Germany | 4 | 4% |
| Japan | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 66 | 63% |
| Scientists | 27 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 833 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 796 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 191 | 23% |
| Researcher | 132 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 118 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 94 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 49 | 6% |
| Other | 142 | 17% |
| Unknown | 107 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 243 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 176 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 6% |
| Engineering | 40 | 5% |
| Other | 70 | 8% |
| Unknown | 160 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 181. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#221,843
of 25,452,734 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychologia
#32
of 4,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,346
of 369,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychologia
#2
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,452,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.