↓ Skip to main content

Graphene and graphene oxide: biofunctionalization and applications in biotechnology

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Biotechnology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1322 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1393 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Graphene and graphene oxide: biofunctionalization and applications in biotechnology
Published in
Trends in Biotechnology, March 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.01.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Wang, Zhaohui Li, Jun Wang, Jinghong Li, Yuehe Lin

Abstract

Graphene is the basic building block of 0D fullerene, 1D carbon nanotubes, and 3D graphite. Graphene has a unique planar structure, as well as novel electronic properties, which have attracted great interests from scientists. This review selectively analyzes current advances in the field of graphene bioapplications. In particular, the biofunctionalization of graphene for biological applications, fluorescence-resonance-energy-transfer-based biosensor development by using graphene or graphene-based nanomaterials, and the investigation of graphene or graphene-based nanomaterials for living cell studies are summarized in more detail. Future perspectives and possible challenges in this rapidly developing area are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,393 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 <1%
Germany 7 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
India 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Other 18 1%
Unknown 1336 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 375 27%
Student > Master 206 15%
Researcher 164 12%
Student > Bachelor 117 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 68 5%
Other 196 14%
Unknown 267 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 287 21%
Engineering 187 13%
Materials Science 167 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 7%
Physics and Astronomy 80 6%
Other 221 16%
Unknown 349 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,660,444
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Biotechnology
#684
of 2,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,639
of 123,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Biotechnology
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.