↓ Skip to main content

History of plant tissue culture

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Biotechnology, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 1,156)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
724 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
History of plant tissue culture
Published in
Molecular Biotechnology, June 2007
DOI 10.1007/s12033-007-0031-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trevor A. Thorpe

Abstract

Plant tissue culture, or the aseptic culture of cells, tissues, organs, and their components under defined physical and chemical conditions in vitro, is an important tool in both basic and applied studies as well as in commercial application. It owes its origin to the ideas of the German scientist, Haberlandt, at the begining of the 20th century. The early studies led to root cultures, embryo cultures, and the first true callus/tissue cultures. The period between the 1940s and the 1960s was marked by the development of new techniques and the improvement of those that were already in use. It was the availability of these techniques that led to the application of tissue culture to five broad areas, namely, cell behavior (including cytology, nutrition, metabolism, morphogenesis, embryogenesis, and pathology), plant modification and improvement, pathogen-free plants and germplasm storage, clonal propagation, and product (mainly secondary metabolite) formation, starting in the mid-1960s. The 1990s saw continued expansion in the application of the in vitro technologies to an increasing number of plant species. Cell cultures have remained an important tool in the study of basic areas of plant biology and biochemistry and have assumed major significance in studies in molecular biology and agricultural biotechnology. The historical development of these in vitro technologies and their applications are the focus of this chapter.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 724 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 709 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 144 20%
Student > Master 86 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 11%
Researcher 50 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 4%
Other 85 12%
Unknown 251 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 251 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 123 17%
Engineering 20 3%
Chemistry 13 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 2%
Other 42 6%
Unknown 264 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,484,692
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biotechnology
#47
of 1,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,458
of 80,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biotechnology
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.