↓ Skip to main content

DNA and chromosomal damage induced in fish (Anguilla anguilla L.) by aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA)—the major environmental breakdown product of glyphosate

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
DNA and chromosomal damage induced in fish (Anguilla anguilla L.) by aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA)—the major environmental breakdown product of glyphosate
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11356-014-2803-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Guilherme, M. A. Santos, I. Gaivão, M. Pacheco

Abstract

The assessment of the direct impact of breakdown products of pesticide components on aquatic wildlife is ecotoxicologically relevant, but frequently disregarded. In this context, the evaluation of the genotoxic hazard posed by aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA--the major natural degradation product of glyphosate) to fish emerges as a critical but unexplored issue. Hence, the main goal of the present research was to assess the AMPA genotoxic potential to fish following short-term exposures (1 and 3 days) to environmentally realistic concentrations (11.8 and 23.6 μg L(-1)), using the comet and erythrocytic nuclear abnormalities (ENA) assays, as reflecting different levels of damage, i.e. DNA and chromosomal damage, respectively. Overall, the present findings pointed out the genotoxic hazard of AMPA to fish and, subsequently, the importance of including it in future studies concerning the risk assessment of glyphosate-based herbicides in the water systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 3 4%
France 1 1%
Unknown 75 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 15 19%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Professor 4 5%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 16%
Environmental Science 8 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2017.
All research outputs
#13,978,562
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#2,645
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,042
of 229,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#25
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.