| Chapter title |
Fungal degradation of calcium-, lead- and silicon-bearing minerals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioMetals, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10534-005-1539-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ademola O. Adeyemi, Geoffrey M. Gadd |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 20% |
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,556,475
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from BioMetals
#159
of 647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,461
of 57,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMetals
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 647 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.