↓ Skip to main content

Workshop on Bioanalytical Methods Validation for Macromolecules: Summary Report

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, September 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Workshop on Bioanalytical Methods Validation for Macromolecules: Summary Report
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, September 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1013062600566
Pubmed ID
Authors

Krys J. Miller, Ronald R. Bowsher, Abbie Celniker, Jacqueline Gibbons, Shalini Gupta, Jean W. Lee, Steve J. Swanson, Wendell C. Smith, Russell S. Weiner, Daan J. A. Crommelin, Ira Das, Binodh S. DeSilva, Robert F. Dillard, Michael Geier, Han Gunn, Masood N. Khan, Dean W. Knuth, Michael Kunitani, Gerald D. Nordblom, Rene J. A. Paulussen, Jeffrey M. Sailstad, Richard L. Tacey, Ann Watson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Chemistry 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#2,779
of 2,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,877
of 40,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.