↓ Skip to main content

Mutations in SPECC1L, encoding sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domains 1-like, are found in some cases of autosomal dominant Opitz G/BBB syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Genetics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutations in SPECC1L, encoding sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domains 1-like, are found in some cases of autosomal dominant Opitz G/BBB syndrome
Published in
Journal of Medical Genetics, November 2014
DOI 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102677
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Kruszka, Dong Li, Margaret H Harr, Nathan R Wilson, Daniel Swarr, Elizabeth M McCormick, Rosetta M Chiavacci, Mindy Li, Ariel F Martinez, Rachel A Hart, Donna M McDonald-McGinn, Matthew A Deardorff, Marni J Falk, Judith E Allanson, Cindy Hudson, John P Johnson, Irfan Saadi, Hakon Hakonarson, Maximilian Muenke, Elaine H Zackai

Abstract

Opitz G/BBB syndrome is a heterogeneous disorder characterised by variable expression of midline defects including cleft lip and palate, hypertelorism, laryngealtracheoesophageal anomalies, congenital heart defects, and hypospadias. The X-linked form of the condition has been associated with mutations in the MID1 gene on Xp22. The autosomal dominant form has been linked to chromosome 22q11.2, although the causative gene has yet to be elucidated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Saudi Arabia 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 19 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 21 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,946,070
of 24,598,501 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#1,549
of 3,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,992
of 372,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,598,501 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.