| Title |
The Role of Emotion and Emotion Regulation in Social Anxiety Disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Psychiatry Reports, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11920-014-0531-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hooria Jazaieri, Amanda S. Morrison, Philippe R. Goldin, James J. Gross |
| Abstract |
Many psychiatric disorders involve problematic patterns of emotional reactivity and regulation. In this review, we consider recent findings regarding emotion and emotion regulation in the context of social anxiety disorder (SAD). We first describe key features of SAD which suggest altered emotional and self-related processing difficulties. Next, we lay the conceptual foundation for a discussion of emotion and emotion regulation and present a common framework for understanding emotion regulation, the process model of emotion regulation. Using the process model, we evaluate the recent empirical literature spanning self-report, observational, behavioral, and physiological methods across five specific families of emotion regulation processes-situation selection, situation modification, attentional deployment, cognitive change, and response modulation. Next, we examine the empirical evidence behind two psychosocial interventions for SAD: cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). Throughout, we present suggestions for future directions in the continued examination of emotion and emotion regulation in SAD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 358 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 14% |
| Researcher | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 35 | 10% |
| Unknown | 97 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 171 | 48% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 9% |
| Unknown | 112 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2016.
All research outputs
#12,906,644
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#763
of 1,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,382
of 361,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#16
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.