↓ Skip to main content

A Time Limit for Initiating Anti-Inflammatory Treatment for Improved Olfactory Function after Head Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurotrauma, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Time Limit for Initiating Anti-Inflammatory Treatment for Improved Olfactory Function after Head Injury
Published in
Journal of Neurotrauma, January 2018
DOI 10.1089/neu.2017.5316
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masayoshi Kobayashi, Kengo Tamari, Masako Kitano, Kazuhiko Takeuchi

Abstract

We previously reported that treatment with an anti-inflammatory drug, specifically a steroid, is effective in improving recovery outcome during acute phase of head injury. Clinically, however, patients with head injury usually become aware of their olfactory loss several weeks or months after the injury, which may be a critical factor in poor recovery from olfactory dysfunction. This raises an important question; when should steroid administration begin in order to achieve optimum improvement of olfactory dysfunction? The present study was designed to reveal the time limit for starting anti-inflammatory treatment for better improvement of post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction. Olfactory nerve transection (NTx) was performed in OMP (olfactory marker protein)-tau-lacZ mice and subcutaneous injections of dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DXM) for 5 consecutive days was started at 7, 14, 28 and 42 days after the NTx (7, 14, 28 and 42-day time points). Histological assessment of olfactory nerve recovery in the olfactory bulb was made at 5, 14 and 42 days after the start of drug treatment. Olfactory function assessments using both an olfactory avoidance behavioral test and evoked potential testing were also performed. Animals treated at 7-days post injury had less injury-associated tissue with fewer astrocytes and macrophages and better histological and functional nerve recovery compared to control mice. However, those treated at 14, 28 or 42-days post injury did not show significant histological or functional differences between saline control and treatment groups. These findings suggest that an anti-inflammatory treatment using steroids for traumatic olfactory dysfunction may be effective if started at least by 7 days but may be ineffective at 14 days or later after head injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 47%
Neuroscience 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,605,790
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurotrauma
#1,729
of 2,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,134
of 450,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurotrauma
#25
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.