↓ Skip to main content

Preoperative Prognostic Factors After Liver Resection for Non‐Colorectal, Non‐Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases and Validation of the Adam Score in an Asian Population

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Preoperative Prognostic Factors After Liver Resection for Non‐Colorectal, Non‐Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases and Validation of the Adam Score in an Asian Population
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00268-017-4208-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dayna P. Y. Sim, Brian K. P. Goh, Ser‐Yee Lee, Chung‐Yip Chan, Iain B. H. Tan, Peng‐Chung Cheow, Premaraj Jeyaraj, Pierce K. H. Chow, London L. P. J. Ooi, Alexander Y. F. Chung

Abstract

Historically, the benefit of liver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine (NCNN) liver metastases has been controversial. This study aims to determine the preoperative prognostic factors of liver resection for NCNN liver metastases and validate the Adam score in an Asian population. Consecutive patients who underwent liver resection for NCNN liver metastases were identified retrospectively from a prospective liver resection database of the single institution between 2001 and 2014. Univariate Cox regression models were used to identify associations with outcome variables. Recurrence-free interval and overall survival were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Seventy-eight consecutive patients were identified, which met the study criteria. Univariate analysis demonstrated that adenocarcinoma histology of primary cancer, disease-free interval and number of nodules were significant predictors of survival. Four of the six components of Adam score were significant predictors of survival. These were the presence of extrahepatic metastases, R2 resection, disease-free interval and type of a primary tumour. The total Adam score was also a significant predictor of survival. Liver resection for NCNN liver metastases is a safe and viable treatment option in carefully selected patients. Significant preoperative prognostic factors include adenocarcinoma primary tumours, disease-free interval and number of nodules. The total Adam score was a good predictor of overall survival and can be used to risk stratify patients undergoing hepatic resection for NCNN liver metastases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,576,855
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,495
of 4,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,028
of 315,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#79
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.