↓ Skip to main content

The limits to equivalent living conditions: regional disparities in premature mortality in Germany

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
The limits to equivalent living conditions: regional disparities in premature mortality in Germany
Published in
The Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10389-017-0865-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Plümper, Denise Laroze, Eric Neumayer

Abstract

Despite the country's explicit political goal to establish equivalent living conditions across Germany, significant inequality continues to exist. We argue that premature mortality is an excellent proxy variable for testing the claim of equivalent living conditions since the root causes of premature death are socioeconomic. We analyse variation in premature mortality across Germany's 402 districts and cities in 2014. Premature mortality spatially clusters among geographically contiguous and proximate districts/cities and is higher in more urban places as well as in districts/cities located further north and in former East Germany. We demonstrate that, first, socioeconomic factors account for 62% of the cross-sectional variation in years of potential life lost and 70% of the variation in the premature mortality rate. Second, we show that these socioeconomic factors either entirely or almost fully eliminate the systematic spatial patterns that exist in premature mortality. On its own, fiscal redistribution, the centrepiece of how Germany aspires to establish its political goal, cannot generate equivalent living conditions in the absence of a comprehensive set of economic and social policies at all levels of political administration, tackling the disparities in socioeconomic factors that collectively result in highly unequal living conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 27%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Computer Science 1 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2018.
All research outputs
#16,059,697
of 25,394,081 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,872
of 445,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,081 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them