↓ Skip to main content

Mining and Environmental Health Disparities in Native American Communities

Overview of attention for article published in Current Environmental Health Reports, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 360)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
115 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
Title
Mining and Environmental Health Disparities in Native American Communities
Published in
Current Environmental Health Reports, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40572-017-0140-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johnnye Lewis, Joseph Hoover, Debra MacKenzie

Abstract

More than a century of hard rock mining has left a legacy of >160,000 abandoned mines in the Western USA that are home to the majority of Native American lands. This article describes how abrogation of treaty rights, ineffective policies, lack of infrastructure, and a lack of research in Native communities converge to create chronic exposure, ill-defined risks, and tribal health concerns. Recent results show that Native Americans living near abandoned uranium mines have an increased likelihood for kidney disease and hypertension, and an increased likelihood of developing multiple chronic diseases linked to their proximity to the mine waste and activities bringing them in contact with the waste. Biomonitoring confirms higher than expected exposure to uranium and associated metals in the waste in adults, neonates, and children in these communities. These sites will not be cleaned up for many generations making it critical to understand and prioritize exposure-toxicity relationships in Native populations to appropriately allocate limited resources to protect health. Recent initiatives, in partnership with Native communities, recognize these needs and support development of tribal research capacity to ensure that research respectful of tribal culture and policies can address concerns in the future. In addition, recognition of the risks posed by these abandoned sites should inform policy change to protect community health in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 115 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 202 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Researcher 15 7%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 70 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 14%
Environmental Science 24 12%
Social Sciences 17 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 77 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 284. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#127,242
of 25,830,657 outputs
Outputs from Current Environmental Health Reports
#9
of 360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,795
of 324,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Environmental Health Reports
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.