↓ Skip to main content

Characterizing the HIV Prevention and Care Continua in a Sample of Transgender Youth in the U.S.

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Characterizing the HIV Prevention and Care Continua in a Sample of Transgender Youth in the U.S.
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10461-017-1938-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sari L. Reisner, Laura Jadwin-Cakmak, Jaclyn M. White Hughto, Miguel Martinez, Liz Salomon, Gary W. Harper

Abstract

In the U.S., transgender and other gender minority (TG) youth are an at-risk group understudied in HIV prevention and treatment. This study sought to characterize the HIV prevention and care continua in a diverse sample of 181 sexually-active TG ages 16-24 years (mean age = 20.7 years; 76.8% trans feminine; 69.1% youth of color) recruited July-December 2015 in 14 U.S. cities. Overall, 30.9% reported living with HIV, of which 71.4% were on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and 55.0% were medication adherent; 65.6% were known to be virally suppressed. In multivariable models, medical gender affirmation was associated with lower odds of viral suppression. Medical gender affirmation and stigma in HIV care were each independently associated with elevated odds of having missed HIV care appointments. Among at-risk TG youth not living with HIV, only 8.2% had accessed pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Early biobehavioral prevention and treatment interventions are needed for TG youth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Student > Master 22 15%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 39 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 17%
Psychology 24 16%
Social Sciences 21 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 47 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,973,651
of 25,107,281 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#241
of 3,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,524
of 332,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#5
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,107,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.