↓ Skip to main content

Believing in “Us”: Exploring Leaders’ Capacity to Enhance Team Confidence and Performance by Building a Sense of Shared Social Identity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
346 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Believing in “Us”: Exploring Leaders’ Capacity to Enhance Team Confidence and Performance by Building a Sense of Shared Social Identity
Published in
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, March 2015
DOI 10.1037/xap0000033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrien Fransen, S. Alexander Haslam, Niklas K. Steffens, Norbert Vanbeselaere, Bert De Cuyper, Filip Boen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 339 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 21%
Student > Bachelor 60 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Researcher 18 5%
Other 54 16%
Unknown 77 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 107 31%
Sports and Recreations 69 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 31 9%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 2%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 87 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,197,846
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
#64
of 725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,627
of 273,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.