↓ Skip to main content

Pneumocephalus: Case Illustrations and Review

Overview of attention for article published in Neurocritical Care, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Pneumocephalus: Case Illustrations and Review
Published in
Neurocritical Care, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12028-010-9363-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clemens M. Schirmer, Carl B. Heilman, Anish Bhardwaj

Abstract

Pneumocephalus is commonly encountered after neurosurgical procedures but can also be caused by craniofacial trauma and tumors of the skull base and rarely, can occur spontaneously. Contributing factors for the development of pneumocephalus include head position, duration of surgery, nitrous oxide (N(2)O) anesthesia, hydrocephalus, intraoperative osmotherapy, hyperventilation, spinal anesthesia, barotauma, continuous CSF drainage via lumbar drain, epidural anesthesia, infections, and neoplasms. Clinical presentation includes headaches, nausea and vomiting, seizures, dizziness, and depressed neurological status. In this article, we review the incidence, mechanisms, precipitating factors, diagnosis, and management of pneumocephalus. Search of Medline, databases, and manual review of article bibliographies. Considering four case illustrations that typify pneumocephalus in clinical practice, we discuss the common etiologies, and confirm the diagnosis with neuroimaging and management strategies. Avoidance of contributing factors, high index of suspicion, and confirmation with neuroimaging are important in attenuating mortality and morbidity. A significant amount of pneumocephalus can simulate a space-occupying lesion. Supplemental oxygen increases the rate of absorption of pneumocephalus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 164 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 22 13%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Student > Master 14 8%
Other 46 27%
Unknown 40 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 55%
Neuroscience 13 8%
Psychology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 50 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,944,246
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#657
of 1,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,202
of 95,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.