| Title |
Amber, beads and social interaction in the Late Prehistory of the Iberian Peninsula: an update
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-017-0549-7 |
| Authors |
Carlos P. Odriozola, Ana C. Sousa, Rui Mataloto, Rui Boaventura, Marco Andrade, Rodrigo Villalobos García, José Ángel Garrido-Cordero, Eugenio Rodríguez, José María Martínez-Blanes, Miguel Ángel Avilés, Joan Daura, Montserrat Sanz, José Antonio Riquelme |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 43% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,903,534
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#196
of 927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,016
of 332,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.