↓ Skip to main content

Brief Report: Bullying and Anxiety in High-Functioning Adolescents with ASD

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Brief Report: Bullying and Anxiety in High-Functioning Adolescents with ASD
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3378-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerrit van Schalkwyk, Isaac C. Smith, Wendy K. Silverman, Fred R. Volkmar

Abstract

Youth with ASD are more likely to experience bullying than their typically developing peers. This risk has not been studied in youth with ASD transitioning to college. We examined the occurrence of bullying in 35 high functioning youth with ASD who were preparing to attend college. We also examined youth anxiety and ASD symptoms. Fifty-one percent of the sample reported being recent victims of bullying; 31% of parents reported their child was a victim of bullying. Parent report of bullying correlated significantly with ratings of youth social anxiety symptoms. These findings suggest that bullying is an issue of concern for higher functioning, older adolescents with ASD, and that their own reports may be particularly important in identifying its occurrence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Researcher 10 6%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 61 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 29%
Social Sciences 14 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 68 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2017.
All research outputs
#16,237,186
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3,904
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,514
of 446,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#79
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.