Title |
2017 Roadmap for Innovation—ACC Health Policy Statement on Healthcare Transformation in the Era of Digital Health, Big Data, and Precision Health A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Health Policy Statements and Systems of Care
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.018 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sanjeev P. Bhavnani, Kapil Parakh, Ashish Atreja, Regina Druz, Garth N. Graham, Salim S. Hayek, Harlan M. Krumholz, Thomas M. Maddox, Maulik D. Majmudar, John S. Rumsfeld, Bimal R. Shah |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 227 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 87 | 38% |
United Kingdom | 10 | 4% |
Spain | 10 | 4% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 5 | 2% |
Canada | 4 | 2% |
France | 3 | 1% |
Colombia | 3 | 1% |
Belgium | 3 | 1% |
China | 2 | <1% |
Other | 23 | 10% |
Unknown | 77 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 160 | 70% |
Scientists | 37 | 16% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 328 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 49 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 11% |
Researcher | 32 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
Other | 70 | 21% |
Unknown | 105 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 12% |
Computer Science | 36 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 31 | 9% |
Engineering | 24 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 21 | 6% |
Other | 61 | 19% |
Unknown | 117 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 228. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2022.
All research outputs
#169,997
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#373
of 16,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,521
of 341,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#15
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.