| Title |
Traditional mortar represented by sticky rice lime mortar—One of the great inventions in ancient China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11431-008-0317-0 |
| Authors |
FuWei Yang, BingJian Zhang, ChangChu Pan, YuYao Zeng |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 19 | 26% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 8 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences
#68
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,097
of 125,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them