↓ Skip to main content

Arsenic and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Current Environmental Health Reports, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Arsenic and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review
Published in
Current Environmental Health Reports, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40572-014-0024-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Zheng, Chin-Chi Kuo, Jeffrey Fadrowski, Jackie Agnew, Virginia M. Weaver, Ana Navas-Acien

Abstract

In epidemiologic studies, high arsenic exposure has been associated with adverse kidney disease outcomes. We performed a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence of the association between arsenic and various kidney disease outcomes. The search period was January 1966 through January 2014. Twenty-five papers (comprising 24 studies) meeting the search criteria were identified and included in this review. In most studies, arsenic exposure was assessed by measurement of urine concentrations or with an ecological indicator. There was a generally positive association between arsenic and albuminuria and proteinuria outcomes. There was mixed evidence of an association between arsenic exposure and chronic kidney disease (CKD), β-2 microglobulin (β2MG), and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) outcomes. There was evidence of a positive association between arsenic exposure and kidney disease mortality. Assessment of a small number of studies with three or more categories showed a clear dose-response association between arsenic and prevalent albuminuria and proteinuria, but not with CKD outcomes. Eight studies lacked adjustment for possible confounders, and two had small study populations. The evaluation of the causality of the association between arsenic exposure and kidney disease outcomes is limited by the small number of studies, lack of study quality, and limited prospective evidence. Because of the high prevalence of arsenic exposure worldwide, there is a need for additional well-designed epidemiologic and mechanistic studies of arsenic and kidney disease outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Unknown 112 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 31 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 9%
Environmental Science 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Engineering 7 6%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 42 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,521,980
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Current Environmental Health Reports
#67
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,348
of 228,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Environmental Health Reports
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.