↓ Skip to main content

Pathogenesis and Management of the Diabetogenic Effect of Statins: a Role for Adiponectin and Coenzyme Q10?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Atherosclerosis Reports, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Pathogenesis and Management of the Diabetogenic Effect of Statins: a Role for Adiponectin and Coenzyme Q10?
Published in
Current Atherosclerosis Reports, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11883-014-0472-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dick C. Chan, Jing Pang, Gerald F. Watts

Abstract

There is growing evidence to suggest that statin therapy is associated with an increased risk of incident diabetes. The risk for statin-related diabetes depends upon many factors including age, pre-existing diabetic risk, type and potency of statin. Several mechanisms have been suggested for the diabetogenic effects of statins involving processes that alter islet ß-cell function, resulting in impaired glucose metabolism. Recent evidence suggests that the association of statin therapy with the development of diabetes may be partly mediated by a statin-induced decrease in circulating adiponectin and coenzyme Q10. The available evidence suggests the benefit of statins in reducing cardiovascular events outweigh the risk of developing diabetes. Moreover, statin therapy does not impair glycemic control in diabetic patients. Expert recommendations for the use of statins in people at risk of developing diabetes have recently been published. However, further research is required to elucidate both the association between statin use and incident diabetes as well as underlying mechanisms.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 29%
Student > Master 6 15%
Other 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,243,777
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#706
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,335
of 256,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.