You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chronic PM2.5 exposure and inflammation: Determining sensitive subgroups in mid-life women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envres.2014.03.042 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bart Ostro, Brian Malig, Rachel Broadwin, Rupa Basu, Ellen B. Gold, Joyce T. Bromberger, Carol Derby, Steven Feinstein, Gail A. Greendale, Elizabeth A. Jackson, Howard M. Kravitz, Karen A. Matthews, Barbara Sternfeld, Kristin Tomey, Robin R. Green, Rochelle Green |
| Abstract |
Several cohort studies report associations between chronic exposure to ambient fine particles (PM2.5) and cardiovascular mortality. Uncertainty exists about biological mechanisms responsible for this observation, but systemic inflammation has been postulated. In addition, the subgroups susceptible to inflammation have not been fully elucidated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 24% |
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 15% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 23% |
| Unknown | 39 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2016.
All research outputs
#1,046,377
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research
#526
of 7,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,059
of 242,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research
#6
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.