↓ Skip to main content

Historical Study of Japanese“Kata-Kana” Characters

Overview of attention for article published in Transactions of the Japan Academy, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 106)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
49 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Historical Study of Japanese“Kata-Kana” Characters
Published in
Transactions of the Japan Academy, January 1997
DOI 10.2183/tja1948.51.227
Authors

Hiroshi TSUKISHIMA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,038,070
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the Japan Academy
#2
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#744
of 93,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the Japan Academy
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them