↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with prolonged time to treatment failure with fulvestrant 500 mg in patients with post-menopausal estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: a sub-group analysis of the…

Overview of attention for article published in Current Medical Research & Opinion, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with prolonged time to treatment failure with fulvestrant 500 mg in patients with post-menopausal estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: a sub-group analysis of the JBCRG-C06 Safari study
Published in
Current Medical Research & Opinion, November 2017
DOI 10.1080/03007995.2017.1400426
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hidetoshi Kawaguchi, Norikazu Masuda, Takahiro Nakayama, Kenjiro Aogi, Keisei Anan, Yoshinori Ito, Shoichiro Ohtani, Nobuaki Sato, Shigehira Saji, Toshimi Takano, Eriko Tokunaga, Seigo Nakamura, Yoshie Hasegawa, Masaya Hattori, Tomomi Fujisawa, Satoshi Morita, Miki Yamaguchi, Hiroko Yamashita, Toshinari Yamashita, Yutaka Yamamoto, Daisuke Yotsumoto, Masakazu Toi, Shinji Ohno

Abstract

The JBCRG-C06 Safari study showed that earlier fulvestrant 500 mg (F500) use, a longer time from diagnosis to F500 use, and no prior palliative chemotherapy were associated with significantly longer time to treatment failure (TTF) among Japanese patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer (ABC). The objective of this subgroup analysis was to further examine data from the Safari study, focusing on ER+ and human epidermal growth factor receptor-negative (HER2-) cases. The Safari study (UMIN000015168) was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study, conducted in 1072 patients in Japan taking F500 for ER+ ABC. The subanalysis included only patients administered F500 as second-line or later therapy (n = 960). Of these, 828 patients were HER2-. Multivariate analysis showed that advanced age (≥65 years; p = 0.035), longer time (≥3 years) from AMBC ABC diagnosis to F500 use (p < 0.001), no prior chemotherapy (p < 0.001), and F500 treatment line (p < 0.001) were correlated with prolonged TTF (median 5.39 months). In ER+/HER2- patients receiving F500 as a second-line or later therapy, treatment line, advanced age, no prior palliative chemotherapy use, and a longer period from ABC diagnosis to F500 use were associated with longer TTF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Current Medical Research & Opinion
#2,680
of 3,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339,240
of 445,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Medical Research & Opinion
#32
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.