| Title |
Center-of-mass corrections for sub-cm-precision laser-ranging targets: Starlette, Stella and LARES
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Geodesy, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00190-014-0776-y |
| Authors |
Toshimichi Otsubo, Robert A. Sherwood, Graham M. Appleby, Reinhart Neubert |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 27% |
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 55% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 18% |
| Engineering | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,243,777
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geodesy
#259
of 280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,950
of 258,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geodesy
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.